Skip to main content
Digital Compliance Bureau
a promotional graphic telling you that PCI Compliance is no longer an annual exercise and that continuous monitory must be built in
Category: Technical Controls

Encryption at Rest

Also known as: Data-at-rest encryption, At-rest encryption
Simply put

Encryption at rest is the practice of encrypting data while it is stored, for example on a disk, solid-state drive, or backup media, so that the stored information cannot be read by someone who gains access to the storage without the decryption key. Its purpose is to protect data from outcomes such as data breaches, unauthorized access, and physical theft of storage media. It is generally treated as complementary to encryption in transit, which protects data while it moves across networks, and best practice typically applies both.

Formal definition

Encryption at rest refers to the application of cryptographic transformation to persisted data so that stored ciphertext is unreadable without access to the corresponding cryptographic key. It is designed to prevent an attacker who obtains the physical or logical storage medium (disks, SSDs, backup media) from accessing plaintext, since without the key the stored data is unusable. It is distinct from encryption in transit, which secures data as it traverses networks, and the two address different threat surfaces; a comprehensive control posture generally applies both. Encryption at rest is a technical safeguard rather than a regulatory requirement in itself, though it is frequently referenced as a measure that supports data protection and can assist with obligations under regimes such as the GDPR. Implementation details, key management responsibilities, and coverage (for example disk-level versus application-level encryption) vary by platform and deployment, and the specific configuration determines the actual protection achieved; readers should verify particulars against the current documentation of the relevant service or standard.

Why it matters

Data that is stored persists far longer than data in motion, and storage media can be lost, stolen, decommissioned improperly, or accessed through a compromised system. Encryption at rest addresses this exposure by ensuring that, without the corresponding cryptographic key, the stored information is unreadable. According to the evidence reviewed, this control is designed to protect against outcomes such as data breaches, unauthorized access, and the physical theft of disks, solid-state drives, or backup media. It does not eliminate every risk, but it narrows the window in which an attacker who obtains the raw storage can extract usable plaintext.

For compliance purposes, encryption at rest is frequently cited as a technical safeguard that supports data protection obligations rather than being a mandate in its own right. Cloud provider guidance describes it as relevant to regulatory compliance and, in the context of the GDPR, as a measure that can assist with protecting personal data. Readers should note the distinction: encryption at rest is a security control that may help demonstrate that appropriate technical measures are in place, but it is not by itself a regulatory requirement, and its usefulness toward any specific obligation depends on how it is implemented and on the applicable legal regime.

Because encryption at rest and encryption in transit address different threat surfaces, treating one as a substitute for the other leaves a gap. Encryption at rest protects stored data; encryption in transit protects data moving across networks. The sources reviewed consistently describe applying both as best practice, since the actual protection achieved depends on coverage, configuration, and key management rather than on the mere presence of encryption.

Who it's relevant to

Information Security Professionals
Security teams responsible for protecting stored data use encryption at rest as one layer of a broader control posture. They should pay particular attention to key management responsibilities and to whether coverage is disk-level or application-level, since the configuration — not the label — determines the protection actually delivered. It is best paired with encryption in transit to address the distinct threat surfaces of stored and moving data.
Data Protection and Compliance Officers
Encryption at rest is commonly referenced as a technical safeguard supporting data protection, and provider guidance ties it to regimes such as the GDPR. Officers should treat it as a control that may help demonstrate appropriate technical measures rather than as a standalone regulatory requirement, and should assess whether the specific implementation genuinely reduces the relevant risk. Application to any particular obligation is fact-specific and warrants professional judgment.
Auditors and Assessors
When evaluating an environment, encryption at rest should be examined for scope and key management rather than accepted as a checkbox. An assessor will generally want to confirm what data is covered, how keys are controlled, and whether the deployment matches the documentation. Configuration details should be verified against the current documentation of the relevant service or standard.
Cloud and Infrastructure Architects
Those designing storage and backup systems decide where encryption is applied and how keys are handled. Because major cloud platforms may encrypt stored data by default and offer varying key-management options, architects should confirm coverage across disks, SSDs, and backup media, and design so that at-rest and in-transit protections work together.

Inside Encryption at Rest

Data at Rest
Data stored on persistent media such as disk drives, solid-state drives, backup tapes, databases, or object storage, as distinguished from data in transit (moving across networks) and data in use (actively processed in memory). Encryption at rest addresses only the stored state.
Encryption Algorithm and Key Length
The cryptographic method applied to render stored data unintelligible without the corresponding key. Strength depends on the algorithm and key length selected; organizations generally align choices with recognized cryptographic guidance, which is periodically updated as algorithms age or weaknesses emerge.
Key Management
The generation, storage, distribution, rotation, and destruction of cryptographic keys. The security of encryption at rest depends heavily on key management, since access to keys generally undermines the protection regardless of algorithm strength. This is often the most operationally demanding component.
Implementation Layer
The point at which encryption is applied, which may include full-disk or volume encryption, file- or folder-level encryption, database-level encryption, or application-level encryption. Each layer offers different protection scope and threat coverage.
Access Controls
Authentication and authorization mechanisms that govern who or what can decrypt data. Encryption at rest is complementary to access controls rather than a substitute for them; both are typically needed to protect stored data.

Common questions

Answers to the questions practitioners most commonly ask about Encryption at Rest.

Does encrypting data at rest by itself make an organization compliant with data protection regulations?
No. Encryption at rest is a technical safeguard that may help satisfy security obligations, but no major regulation treats it as automatic compliance. Instruments such as the GDPR in the EU generally require appropriate technical and organizational measures determined by risk, and encryption is cited as an example rather than a guaranteed sufficient control. Sector rules in the United States, such as HIPAA's Security Rule, similarly treat encryption as an addressable or recommended measure within a broader program. Encryption at rest does not address access control, encryption in transit, key management, breach notification duties, lawful basis for processing, or governance obligations. Its role in reducing or affecting breach notification exposure varies by jurisdiction and by the facts, and readers should verify requirements against the current official text applicable to their situation.
Is encryption at rest the same thing as encryption in transit, or does one replace the other?
They are distinct and address different threat scenarios, so one does not replace the other. Encryption at rest protects stored data on media such as disks, databases, or backups against unauthorized access to that storage, for example if a device or backup is lost or stolen. Encryption in transit protects data as it moves across networks against interception. Data can be exposed while moving even if it is encrypted when stored, and vice versa. Most security frameworks and risk-based regulatory expectations contemplate both, applied according to the sensitivity of the data and the assessed risk. Treating the two as interchangeable leaves a gap in the overall protection of the data lifecycle.
Where in a system should encryption at rest actually be applied?
That depends on the architecture, the data categories involved, and the assessed risk, so there is no single correct layer. Encryption can be implemented at the full-disk or volume level, at the file or object-storage level, within the database (for example column-, table-, or transparent database-level encryption), or at the application layer before data is written. Each layer protects against different scenarios and offers different granularity and performance trade-offs. Backups, replicas, logs, temporary files, and cached data are commonly overlooked locations where sensitive data comes to rest. Organizations generally map where regulated or sensitive data is stored and select layers that align with their risk assessment and any applicable contractual or regulatory expectations, verifying specifics against current authoritative sources.
How does key management affect the value of encryption at rest?
Key management is often the decisive factor, because encryption is only as strong as the protection and governance of the keys. If keys are stored alongside the encrypted data or are broadly accessible, the practical protection may be significantly reduced. Common considerations include where keys are generated and stored, how access to keys is restricted and logged, how keys are rotated and revoked, and how they are backed up and recovered. Some organizations use dedicated key management services or hardware security modules, and some cloud arrangements distinguish between provider-managed and customer-managed keys, which affects who can access data. Auditors and assessors frequently examine key management as closely as the encryption itself. Specific implementation choices should be evaluated against current standards and the organization's own risk profile.
Is encryption at rest something an organization must implement itself, or can a cloud or service provider handle it?
Both models exist, and the appropriate one depends on the service arrangement and the allocation of responsibilities. Many cloud and managed-service providers offer encryption at rest as a native or default feature, but responsibility is typically shared: the provider may secure the underlying storage while the customer remains accountable for configuration, key management choices, and overall compliance. In processing relationships, the roles of the parties, such as controller and processor concepts under EU data protection law, shape who bears which obligations, and these are often documented contractually. Relying on a provider's encryption does not necessarily transfer regulatory accountability. Organizations should review the applicable service terms, shared-responsibility descriptions, and contractual commitments, and confirm how they map to their own obligations.
How can an organization demonstrate that encryption at rest is in place and effective?
Demonstration generally relies on evidence rather than assertion, and the expected evidence differs between an audit, an assessment, and a certification exercise. Common forms of evidence include documented policies and standards, configuration records showing encryption is enabled on relevant storage, key management procedures, and logs or reports confirming the control operates as intended. Frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001 or attestation reports such as SOC 2 may examine encryption as one control among many, but these are voluntary or contractual mechanisms and are not the same as regulatory compliance. Because control expectations and framework versions change over time, organizations typically validate their evidence against the current criteria of the relevant scheme or regulator, and application to specific circumstances requires professional judgment.

Common misconceptions

Encryption at rest protects data in all states, so encrypted storage means the data is secure everywhere.
Encryption at rest generally protects only stored data. Once data is read into memory or transmitted, other controls—such as encryption in transit and runtime protections—are typically required. It does not, on its own, defend against an attacker who obtains valid credentials or the decryption keys.
Any specific law or standard mandates encryption at rest as an absolute requirement.
Treatment varies by jurisdiction and instrument. Many regulations and frameworks reference encryption as a possible safeguard rather than an explicit universal mandate, and obligations are often risk-based and fact-specific. Certain regimes may also treat properly encrypted data differently (for example in breach-notification contexts), but such provisions differ across the EU, the United States, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions. Readers should verify against the current official text applicable to their situation.
Encryption at rest and encryption in general are interchangeable terms.
Encryption at rest refers specifically to protecting stored data and is distinct from encryption in transit, which protects data moving across networks. Conflating them can lead to gaps where one state is protected and the other is not.

Best practices

Treat key management as a first-class concern: define processes for key generation, secure storage separate from the encrypted data, rotation, and destruction, since the protection is generally only as strong as the control over the keys.
Select algorithms and key lengths aligned with current recognized cryptographic guidance, and review these choices periodically as guidance is updated and older algorithms weaken.
Choose the implementation layer (full-disk, file, database, or application level) based on the specific threats you intend to mitigate, recognizing that each layer covers a different scope.
Combine encryption at rest with robust access controls and, where relevant, encryption in transit, rather than relying on any single control to protect stored data.
Document how encryption at rest maps to your applicable regulatory and contractual obligations, and verify specific requirements against the latest authoritative sources for each relevant jurisdiction.
Periodically test and audit both the encryption implementation and the associated key-management processes, and consult qualified professionals when applying these measures to particular circumstances.
Promotional banner for the Penetration Report Template Kit